2009 Mazda 2 vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 100 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 2 | 1992 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 2 | Colt |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2530 mm |