2009 Mazda 2 vs. 1998 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 465 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2.
Because 1998 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 2 | 1998 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercury |
| Model | 2 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
