2009 Mazda 2 vs. 2001 Suzuki SX
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki SX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki SX would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki SX (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Suzuki SX weights approximately 381 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 2 (146 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX. 2001 Suzuki SX has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Suzuki SX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 2 | 2001 Suzuki SX | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | 2 | SX |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1536 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2460 mm |