2009 Mazda 2 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 340 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 2 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 2 | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 82 L |
