2009 Mazda 2 vs. 2006 Nissan Interstar
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Interstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Interstar would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Interstar (112 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Interstar should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Interstar (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Interstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 2 | 2006 Nissan Interstar | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 2 | Interstar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 580 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |
