2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 76 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1947 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 3 | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3670 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2850 mm |
