2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1952 Peugeot 203
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 24 kg more than 1952 Peugeot 203.
Because 1952 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 1952 Peugeot 203 | |
| Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
| Model | 3 | 203 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1290 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1128 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2790 mm |
