2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1954 Pontiac Star Chief
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Pontiac Star Chief would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Pontiac Star Chief (173 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Pontiac Star Chief should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Pontiac Star Chief weights approximately 100 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1954 Pontiac Star Chief | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | 3 | Star Chief |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4715 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3110 mm |