2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1956 Packard Patrician
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Packard Patrician (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Packard Patrician should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1956 Packard Patrician is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Packard Patrician. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1956 Packard Patrician | |
Make | Mazda | Packard |
Model | 3 | Patrician |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3240 mm |