2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 158 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Mazda | Studebaker |
Model | 3 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2009 | 1959 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4246 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2980 mm |