2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,597 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 431 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 3 | Herald |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1147 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 29 L |