2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1962 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. (24 HP @ 3300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1962 Volkswagen Beetle | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | 3 | Beetle |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1129 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 40 L |