2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1963 MG 1100
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 1963 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Mazda | MG |
| Model | 3 | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1098 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |
