2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 144 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | 3 | Tempest |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6376 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2930 mm |