2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 3 | Herald |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1147 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 29 L |