2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 404 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (85 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 3 | Herald |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 69.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 841 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 29 L |