2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1964 Morris Oxford

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1964 Morris Oxford. (39 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Oxford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Morris Oxford weights approximately 1 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.

Because 1964 Morris Oxford is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morris Oxford. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (135 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morris Oxford. (81 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morris Oxford.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 3 1964 Morris Oxford
Make Mazda Morris
Model 3 Oxford
Year Released 2009 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 1489 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 146 HP 39 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4100 RPM
Torque 135 Nm 81 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1125 kg 1126 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2530 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 45 L