2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 578 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 3 | Starfire |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6965 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1820 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3130 mm |