2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Seat 1500 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1964 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 3 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1347 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |