2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Because 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 3 | Dove GTR4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1347 cc | 2138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 29 L |