2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1966 Mercury Cyclone
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cyclone. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cyclone would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cyclone is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cyclone (335 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cyclone should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cyclone weights approximately 390 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cyclone is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cyclone. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Cyclone (579 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Cyclone will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 1966 Mercury Cyclone has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Mercury Cyclone will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1966 Mercury Cyclone | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | 3 | Cyclone |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6393 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 579 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2950 mm |