2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1972 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 48 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1972 Monteverdi 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Monteverdi 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 1972 Monteverdi 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Monteverdi |
| Model | 3 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1996 cc |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 203 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 82 L |
