2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,258 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 3 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2258 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |