2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1977 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1977 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1977 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1977 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 3 | Mark II |
Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1988 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2590 mm |