2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Monteverdi Sahara would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. (81 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | |
| Make | Mazda | Monteverdi |
| Model | 3 | Sahara |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3253 cc |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2550 mm |
