2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1978 Seat 127
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 127 would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1978 Seat 127. (51 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 472 kg more than 1978 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 127. (76 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1978 Seat 127 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 3 | 127 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1010 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 76 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2230 mm |