2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1979 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1979 Toyota Starlet.
Because 1979 Toyota Starlet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Toyota Starlet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1979 Toyota Starlet | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 3 | Starlet |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2310 mm |