2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 3 | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1289 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |