2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 3 | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1108 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |