2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 3 | 9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1108 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 38 L |