2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. Both 2009 Mazda 3 and 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 42 kg more than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 3 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2640 mm |