2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1994 Nissan 270 R
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan 270 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan 270 R would be higher. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan 270 R (270 HP) has 166 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan 270 R should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan 270 R weights approximately 75 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Nissan 270 R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Nissan 270 R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan 270 R (344 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 1994 Nissan 270 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1994 Nissan 270 R | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | 270 R |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 344 Nm |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 273 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1300 mm |