2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1996 Peugeot 106
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Peugeot 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Peugeot 106 would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1996 Peugeot 106. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1996 Peugeot 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Peugeot 106. (87 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Peugeot 106.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1996 Peugeot 106 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 3 | 106 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1124 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 40 L |