2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1996 Peugeot 406
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Peugeot 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Peugeot 406 would be higher. At 1,618 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Peugeot 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1996 Peugeot 406. (88 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Peugeot 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Peugeot 406 weights approximately 58 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Peugeot 406. (130 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Peugeot 406.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1996 Peugeot 406 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 3 | 406 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1618 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2710 mm |