2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1996 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 207 kg more than 1996 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | 3 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1299 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2450 mm |
