2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 157 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | 3 | Baleno |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1839 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2490 mm |