2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 145 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 338 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | 3 | CL |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2200 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 145 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |