2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Suzuki C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 237 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | 3 | C2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 284 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2240 mm |