2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1999 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,792 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota Celica (145 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 102 kg more than 1999 Toyota Celica.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota Celica (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 3 1999 Toyota Celica
Make Mazda Toyota
Model 3 Celica
Year Released 2009 1999
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 1792 cc
Horse Power 104 HP 145 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.6 mm 91.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1192 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 55 L