2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1999 Volkswagen W12
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Volkswagen W12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Volkswagen W12 would be higher. At 5,598 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Volkswagen W12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Volkswagen W12 (414 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Volkswagen W12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1999 Volkswagen W12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Volkswagen W12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 1999 Volkswagen W12 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
| Model | 3 | W12 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5598 cc |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1050 mm |
