2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2001 Nissan X-Trail.

Because 2001 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 3 2001 Nissan X-Trail
Make Mazda Nissan
Model 3 X-Trail
Year Released 2009 2001
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 2487 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 154 HP 177 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1550 kg 1450 kg
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 60 L