2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2001 Oldsmobile O4
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Oldsmobile O4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Oldsmobile O4 would be higher. Both 2009 Mazda 3 and 2001 Oldsmobile O4 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Oldsmobile O4 (187 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Oldsmobile O4 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Oldsmobile O4 weights approximately 258 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Oldsmobile O4 (255 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2001 Oldsmobile O4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 2001 Oldsmobile O4 | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 3 | O4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2720 mm |
