2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2002 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 548 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 2002 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda B2500 (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2002 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 3 | B2500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2499 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2990 mm |