2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2004 Rover City
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover City. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover City would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2004 Rover City | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 3 | City |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1400 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2410 mm |