2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2004 Toyota Hilux
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Hilux. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Hilux would be higher. At 2,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Hilux is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Hilux (210 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Hilux should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 302 kg more than 2004 Toyota Hilux.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Hilux (441 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Hilux will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 2004 Toyota Hilux | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 3 | Hilux |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2786 cc |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 940 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 87 L |
