2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2005 Peugeot 1007
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Peugeot 1007. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Peugeot 1007 would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Peugeot 1007. (74 HP @ 5650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Peugeot 1007. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Peugeot 1007 weights approximately 49 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Peugeot 1007. (120 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Peugeot 1007.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2005 Peugeot 1007 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 3 | 1007 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1360 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1202 kg | 1251 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |