2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda CX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda CX-7 would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 3 | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | 3 | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 2298 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
