2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 MG TF would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG TF (159 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG TF should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2006 MG TF.
Because 2006 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG TF. (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2006 MG TF | |
Make | Mazda | MG |
Model | 3 | TF |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |