2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 78 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer (176 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 3 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Mazda Mitsubishi
Model 3 Lancer
Year Released 2009 2006
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 1999 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 176 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1128 kg 1206 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 42 L