2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2006 Morgan 4 Seater
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Morgan 4 Seater. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Morgan 4 Seater would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Morgan 4 Seater is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Morgan 4 Seater is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Morgan 4 Seater. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Morgan 4 Seater has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Morgan 4 Seater will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2006 Morgan 4 Seater | |
Make | Mazda | Morgan |
Model | 3 | 4 Seater |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3001 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |